CancelReport This Post

Please fill out the form below with your name, e-mail address and the reason(s) you wish to report this post.

 

Crossword Help Forum
Forum Rules

buddy

1st November 2025, 18:17
I'm not sure anyone's answered the question about the puzzle's title yet. The "originators" have another title that begins "Tell me what..." Applying that instruction to the finished grid is useful, I think. Open to other interpretations.
31 of 59  -   Report This Post

candledave

1st November 2025, 18:42
buddy - I think it’s a bit better than that.

The letters you put in the box actually complete the title and also has the application to the final grid as you say
32 of 59  -   Report This Post

hounds

1st November 2025, 19:42
Nice puzzle, do-able, but I don’t really understand the bars instructions in the rubric…
33 of 59  -   Report This Post

jack aubrey

1st November 2025, 20:01
Buddy, I’m with CD. The first intervention (in the barred cells) answers the title as recorded in a different tense in the work in question.
34 of 59  -   Report This Post

jack aubrey

1st November 2025, 20:07
I was there, too, Hounds. When the final PDM hits it is like stepping on a rake. “Refrain” is doing a lot of work and some of the suggestions about using a blank grid to trace the bars might help you get that blow between the eyes.
35 of 59  -   Report This Post

rhsl

1st November 2025, 22:07
I'm not sure that I would have got there without looking at the bars in a blank grid. Many thanks to those who made that suggestion!

A very clever construction, and I can forgive the excessive grid stare!

Thanks, Kea.
36 of 59  -   Report This Post

0pt0

1st November 2025, 23:12
My version of reducing the number of bars to the thematic 66 results in a final grid with lots of non-words. There is no mention of this in the preamble, but I am sure I have the right solution. Do other solvers have non-words in the final grid?
37 of 59  -   Report This Post

rhsl

1st November 2025, 23:28
0pt0, I think that this is a variation on "bars and numbers need not be shown". The solution is so clearly (and cleverly) right that I'm not fussed about the "word" impact of removing bars.
38 of 59  -   Report This Post

0pt0

2nd November 2025, 00:14
Rhsl - I am of the same mind.
39 of 59  -   Report This Post

hotelwhiskey7

2nd November 2025, 04:00
Quisling #23 - surely the solution has 180 degree rotational symmetry? If not, the required steps have not been followed correctly.
40 of 59  -   Report This Post