CancelReport This Post

Please fill out the form below with your name, e-mail address and the reason(s) you wish to report this post.

 

Crossword Help Forum
Forum Rules

malone

7th February 2019, 19:27
Thanks for reaching out to us, Tyke.
96 of 2514  -   Report This Post

jigjag

8th February 2019, 12:42
Malone

Your clever idea of using the * to indicate errors has got me thinking. You will recall that Tesco e-mailed Stevea6000 to get feed back on their Tesco's' idea. Why don’t you contact them to suggest they re-brand as Te’*s’*co’*s’*. They love gimmicks and this is highly original.

The re-branding of Sainsbury to Sainsbury’s is estimated to have cost the company £3m, so Tesco would pay you a huge fee for the idea. Actually the Sainsbury change was first suggested in a posting on this forum 2 or 3 years ago, on the PCT I think. So the company should make a contribution to the PU. We need to find the posting but as Tyke has pointed out, there are 25,000 of them. Can a few of us search them? Sorry, I can’t help. I have got to go shopping.
97 of 2514  -   Report This Post

malone

8th February 2019, 14:05
Jigjag

Although you might have a good, profitable idea, the thought of communicating with Tesco fills me with horror!

On the Tescos/Tesco's/Sainsburys theme, I watched a BBC drama earlier this week. One character had a bit more money than usual, and someone said to her 'Watch it, you'll be shopping in Marks's next'! It could, of course, have been 'Markses' like the earlier 'Bootses'.
98 of 2514  -   Report This Post

chrise

8th February 2019, 15:11
I noticed a large new sign on a small building in town this morning


TAXI'S
99 of 2514  -   Report This Post

tyke51

8th February 2019, 15:14
Abbreviations & Acronyms

I understand why these are used in written work because it can get tedious when the longer version is repeated in the same article but it is annoying when the reader is assumed to know what obscure ones are and has to look them up.
Even worse is their use by radio/tv presenters etc when there is no need. A recent example was a BBC presenter who kept referring to the `World Wildlife Fund` as `double u double u eff`- this defeats the object of using abbrev`s and acronyms as it is longer and more difficult to say!
100 of 2514  -   Report This Post

malone

8th February 2019, 15:31
Tyke, interesting stuff. The 'double u...' usage is a piece of nonsense.

Sorry, I can't resist -, from your post, 'abbrev's' what? (As apostrophe monitor, I am ever-vigilant!
101 of 2514  -   Report This Post

tyke51

8th February 2019, 15:33
Keeping you on your toes` Malone!
102 of 2514  -   Report This Post

malone

8th February 2019, 15:46
On my toe's, surely? Thanks, Tyke.
103 of 2514  -   Report This Post

jigjag

8th February 2019, 16:41
Tyke

Thanks and I agree with Malone that it is nonsense. To me, the "double u double u eff" is the World Wrestling Federation. I have followed this sport for many years.

You get the same problem with ECB and LSE. Presenters keep rattling on without ever using the correct name for the organisation so you don't know if they are talking about (i) the official body for cricket or the European Central Bank, and (ii) the London School of Economics or the London Stock Exchange.

104 of 2514  -   Report This Post

jigjag

8th February 2019, 16:43
Malone

With your permission, I will "take this forward" with Tesco, "going forward".
105 of 2514  -   Report This Post