I think that as the preamble states to use THE diagonal and PART OF THE top border there is no ambiguity about the intended shape.
If it was intended that part of the diagonal would suffice then surely the preamble would have said so, or not included the statement about part of the top border.
There are 12 1a 7a s with an area of less than 56 and many of them have the same angle defined by the use of the diagonal and the top row.
Only one utilises the whole diagonal though and it has an area related to 55, 56. While not an example of 19 down it can be constructed by removing one 19 down from another - both of which as it happens are examples of 1,7.