Finished this pretty quickly last night, but didn’t come on here straight away as I also struggled with the second element of 11a (also my LOI). In fact I think I had the right idea about it, but had to slope on iy (give it a few hours on the clock, if you will) to get there. Still not sure that I would agree that it’s nifty though.
FOI was 4a.
Like geeker, I’m generally a fan of Paul, and have recently had the sane experience of finding his weekday contributions a good deal tricker than his Prizes. This was no exception, but I also felt that it didn’t quite hit the mark, with no particular stand-outs, and quite a few feeling a bit clunky and/or somewhat unsatisfactory. Didn’t know the shark or the parrot so had to reverse engineer the obvious answers with online help. Having done that, I think 21a is probably my COD, mainly because the surface is smooth and quite amusing.
Geeker: I think 1d qualifies as being mildly ‘Pauline’, but it also falls squarely into the clunky/unsatisfactory camp for me.
Perhaps I’ve just got out of bed on the wrong side, as I’m not usually one to criticise setters, least of all Paul (to whom thanks, as ever, and sorry if I’m being unfair - which might well be the case!)