Yes, Rusty, I knew that it went on but not to such a huge extent!
In my innocence / ignorance, I thought it to be on a much smaller scale, and for it to be as hard for the people calling the shots (so to speak)as for the victims who are being court-martialled.
But a lot of it was so kind of hail-fellow-well-met, so casual, so arbitrary, I cannot see any sane pattern or justification at all.
Yes, I guess one could see the logic for some kind of deterrent, but not this!
I wanted to read the book to find out what really went on, I was looking for explanations, but (so far anyway) there aren't any. It's horrendous and inexplicable. And not consistent!
This last is perhaps the worst of all? - the inconsistency?
Am I making any kind of sense?
But I think I have to finish reading the book......as a kind of tribute?