Just as a postscript, and to add context, I asked ChatGPT this question: “Are lift-and-separate crossword clues
(as these are known)Ximenean
(Derrick MacNutt, aka Ximenes, being a recognised, though not universally accepted, arbiter of crossword fairness)?”
It said: “Usually: no - at least not in strict Ximenean terms. “Lift and separate” means you have to re-segment something the clue gives you as one unit (a word/phrase) into different units to make the cryptic reading work (e.g., reading INDEED as IN DEED, or splitting copyright into copy + right).
That kind of “you must change the word-breaks/punctuation to make the wordplay operate” is widely treated as a libertarian device and is often proscribed by Ximenean purists/editors. One guide puts it bluntly: “A Ximenean would choke…” at an “indeed → in deed” style clue. “
I’m not ashamed to be a purist, I’m afraid. I was brought up in the Times tradition. The Guardian, unsurprisingly, has always been at the libertarian end of the spectrum. Araucaria was famous for it.