Hi chris. I watch all the Masterchefs, even though I was angry when they used live sea urchins! No-one said they were live but I am sure they were. This time the uncooked lobsters appeared dead, let us hope pithed. I am no sentimentalist but I do not approve of cruelty even to invertebrates. (Not eating any live oysters!)
I thought Craig would win, simply because his dessert was so original. Neither he or Louisa made a single mistake (just one negative comment is usually enough.)
I have no idea of the answer to your first question, I really thought Matt would be in the final and perhaps win. Unfortunately I was asleep when he got eliminated so I didn't see why! I'd guess the judges try to even out the talent in the two groups.
I think the answer to the second question has two parts. No question, best dishes last. In the earlier rounds it's possible excellent but not necessarily stunning food might be OK. Also they are given real learning experiences and have some time afterwards to reflect and experiment. The invention tests seem very difficult to me- I'd have about half a dozen adaptable recipes ready. Once they had to make a meal from scraps and one chef snootily said he was used to cooking with only the best ingredients. He didn't get through.
Marcus has improved beyond recognition. Do you watch other cookery programs? I don't, except Bake Off before it changed.