Hi Steve; as the originator of Peer Review I have kept a close eye on its development and can honestly say that as a forum for people to showcase their skills and inspirations AND have fun doing so, it has been a success. I have seen no pattern of clique voting, perhaps some people prefer a particular style of composition, perhaps an unsophisticated offering just hits the mark from time to time for some of us but part of the fun is seeing the unfoldment or quirkiness of the result, it is a true democratic arena; I have also been surprised at the outcome sometimes but hey - there's most do queer as folk! The original intention was to glean peoples views and critiques of noteworthy clues as well as votes. Your contributions are greatly appreciated and I would respectfully ask you to reconsider. Please feel free to comment as extensively as you wish! Best, Paul