Hi all you happy people.
Couldn't resist Reply 100 to question your easy acceptance of such a childish word. Its on the level of schoolboy/toilet/bar room humour.
The word was neither known in UK (except to Rambler) or in any reputable UK dictionary.
Further its content was definitely not a topic for conversation in mixed company.
Incidentally (correct me if I'm wrong but very few ladies chose to participate - correctly I think).
Nobody can question Ramblers skill , cleverness and massive knowledge about most th.ings - sorry meant SOME things) but he could surely confine himself to what normally passes as decent and unoffensive allusions, double-entendres and salacious sniggers. I hope that at this late hour you all might jump to Ramblers defence -- but I also hope that one or two might see my point of view.
BTW I only complain when theres a Z in the month. But this time I just make a plea for standards.
And I do so in friendship toward all those I count as good company on this site and forum.
All the best. Hope the Vicars sermon tomorrow is UPLIFTING.... Anyway have a nice day.
Yours Sincerely
THEA