CancelReport This Post

Please fill out the form below with your name, e-mail address and the reason(s) you wish to report this post.

 

Crossword Help Forum
Forum Rules

malone

14th February 2016, 14:44
Thanks, Trevor - that all makes sense. I have to confess that I don't even look to see a setter's name (too many years of the Times crosswords, with all setters being anonymous). I have now checked - and yes, Hoskins, did set today's crossword!

That'll teach me to look for Londonisms when they're not there.
6159 of 30765  -   Report This Post

rusty

14th February 2016, 14:46
Malone, my thinking is (and I shall certainly give way to the ladies on this one!) that frillies could be any size?
There are quite a few large ladies knocking about and I imagine their frillies will not be extra small?
An awful clue at any rate!
6160 of 30765  -   Report This Post

elle

14th February 2016, 14:46
Trev, I think you are correct with Hoskins providing the 'i' - that would fit with the link I found?
then
frill- thrill - ecstasy
e- extra
s=- small
6161 of 30765  -   Report This Post

trevor

14th February 2016, 14:47
a lucky guess.
although, the actor bob hoskins sounded very cockney (he was actually quite posh sounding when he was younger).
6162 of 30765  -   Report This Post

elle

14th February 2016, 14:48
Going to drink my soup before it gets cold ...back shortly for the verdict....
6163 of 30765  -   Report This Post

pigale

14th February 2016, 14:48
Parsing makes much more sense now !
6164 of 30765  -   Report This Post

trevor

14th February 2016, 14:50
elle, E is what people call the drug ecstasy - i think frill = extra (no east end stuff happening).
6165 of 30765  -   Report This Post

malone

14th February 2016, 14:50
Trevor, Elle, Pigale, Rusty - yes, the parsing all works.

Rusty, I will bow to you on the size of the undies - no-one I know would ever refer to 'frillies' anyway!
6166 of 30765  -   Report This Post

rusty

14th February 2016, 14:52
Thank goodness Trevor happened along!
6167 of 30765  -   Report This Post

elle

14th February 2016, 15:03
Yes, good one, Trev!

That makes much better sense than my rather obscure Hoskin's dictionary reference!
That could be referred to as a red herring......
A strange coincidence though - it certainly muddied the waters for me!
Excuse all these mixed metaphors!
6168 of 30765  -   Report This Post