Crossword Help Forum
Forum Rules

Well done Paul a very good clue. Thanks ixion.

@les40

First of all, I am not your 'pal' and probably never will be. I have no idea what you're on about, but I have noticed that you seem to think you are the 'best thing since sliced bread' on this site, to coin a phrase.

As you seem to know some psychotherapists, you've obviously had some experience. Perhaps you need some more? I have no more to say on the matter.

Oh btw, be good

Apologies for inadvertently creating a stooshie...I was slightly rushed last night but I can assure you SteveZ that all the clues were fully considered before I made my choice...

Bravo Paul good clue.

sorry i am late posting (It must be the UK rain)

Some great clues all round.

Ixion (I was expecting Cavalry charges, blood explosions etc) Although Putin may be taking a sky dive into the history books with this one (I suppose its' better than being remembered for gay bashing olympic games)

Cheers all!

Belated congratulations paul, nice, and thanks ixion.

@ rambler and Les. It has been my opinion for quite some time that (for whatever reason and surely not merely to self congratulate or stimulate votes within Peer Review) that multiple personae are one and the same and I accept I also may be wrong but I am a betting man and reckon your assessment, Les, would be trading at long odds on!

Congratulations Paul, thanks Ixion. As for the rest...the plot thickens!

I would be absolutely amazed to learn that a contributor would enter PEER REVIEW under multiple names, let alone actually vote for their own vote. stevezodiac has denied les40's accusation and has not received an apology and another unnamed person is implicated.

Ofc ourse that should read 'vote for their own clue'

Belated (very) congrats Paul, lovely clue!
Cheers Ixion!
Tinkety tonk.