Crossword Help Forum
Forum Rules

It was berkspotter who "had a go at susie" as you put it. the whole thread has been removed and berkspotter has been warned not to post messages threatening to ban people for alleged wrongdoings or he will be the one to be banned. what a joke eh.
phillip technically played no part in this episode and has not received a chummy email from norma whoever.
having said that, I think you guys will just have to get along without me.

Yes. I can confirm what berkspotter said. I think he's a bit cheesed off with the humourless over-sensitive right-on goody goodies. but I expect he will come back sometime to highlight a particularly berkish posting.

Well berkyspotter, I have not really had any dealings with you as such...but I have with your alter ego pip.

We have had words...but I still don't like the thought of anyone being "banned"...although you do have a nasty side honey bunny.

Back to berkspotter, I quite liked your "nonsense"...if you don't pick on people who can not,and/or don't want to deal with you particular sense of "humour", you could just get away with it.

p@

Pip...posts crossed.

I am now truly confused! Split personality?

pastille, it was only berkspotter who was warned to behave himself. it would only be berkspotter who was banned if it came to it.

That was why my "words of dubious wisdom" were directed to him not you...

I like the idea of using our alter egos on this thread and guessing who's who. We could reply to our own posts!

Personally of course I would miss berkspotter who has been nothing but a great source of support and direction to me. Ha ha.

This could be a winner mog...let "US" think about it...